Wednesday, 25 April 2012

St Francis of Assisi and the New Orders

Francis' life up until he converted to Christianity:
What sort of society was Francis Bernardone born into? Western Europe was a changing world. The main signs of this development were economically and demographically. Demographically, the population was increasing rapidly leading to built up areas and new villages. Economically, land was being cleared, grazing was introduced and towns became places of exchanging money.

What were his personality traits? –charming – irresponsible – selfish – wealthy – powerful - violent. Most of these traits changed once he converted to Christianity.

What caused Francis to Convert to Christianity? Francis joined the crusades and was captured by the Perugians. He was imprisoned for a year until he became too sick. This led him so seek religious consolation. One day, he entered the Church of St Damian. He felt a spiritual connection and heard the crucifix speak to him. He obeyed what the crucifix had said and decided to spend his life serving Jesus.
-- Leah

Franciscans and Francis and the natural world 
Supporting Francis’s idea of a divine, equal presence in all creatures and the rejection of the economic and social values of the time were the Franciscans. Alongside Francis’s charismatic and passionate personality, drawing followers in, was his appreciation and love for the natural world. Handling all animals and humans with compassion and humility, Francis had an incredible way of controlling undomesticated animals, healing and uniting with them. Francis went on to write “Canticle of the sun,” a piece of poetry that actualized his love for all creatures and nature around him. Here is a link to the full poem, http://conservation.catholic.org/prayers.htm, below a single verse to share:

“All praise be yours, my Lord, through Brothers Wind and Air,
And fair and stormy, all the weather's moods,
 By which you cherish all that you have made.

All praise be yours, my Lord, through Sister Water,
So useful, lowly, precious, and pure.”
– Canticle of the sun, Francis of Assisi

Through his contagious inspiring fervour that he passed onto his audience within every sermon, people were quick to join the order and share Francis dream of spreading the word of god through travel and living the ideal apostolic life.

The Franciscans were a mendicant order, that is, owning no property and acquired what they needed by working or accepting alms. Their main goals were to live a life of “holy poverty”, preaching the word of god wherever they go as well as to carry out the earthly imitation of Christ as portrayed in the Bible. This order was mainly directed at the laity, stressing to all that it was possible to live an evangelical life within an established church. The Franciscans were devoted to all aspects of the church, proving to be an aid to the Pope in reeling heretics back into the faith. After Francis gained followers, he wrote up a rule which provided a framework and structure for the Franciscans. Also known as friars, they were forbidden to have any money, allowed no personal possessions, only a single robe, and rather residing within the countryside, isolated form the world, to live amongst the people to be able to spread the message of god, penance and attending to the sick and poor.

Francis originally created the movement with no systematic organization; however, it eventually proved to be inefficient. In 1223, he wrote a second version of his rule, with this becoming the official and formal constitution of the Franciscans. The second version provided continuity and reaffirmation to living an apostolic life as well as the establishment of administration within the order. Francis died in 1226, and in 1245 the Pope became the owner of all buildings belonging to the order. Initially, the Franciscans didn’t believe in attaining an education, as it was a form of wealth in contrary to their belief in a life of poverty. However, from 1220 onwards, some friars changed their outlook on the matter, attending universities and receiving an education. Although some friars accepted the matter, many displayed disapproval stating the wrong in disregarding the original perspective authorized by Francis.
-- Cody

The Dominicans and Le Goff arguement about the impact of urban life upon Francis' religious life:
A. The Dominicans:

The Dominicans also known as "The Order of preachers" were one of two new religious orders and comprised of monks/friars who were mendicants which was founded by the Spanish priest, Saint Dominic (1170 – 1221). The Order emphasized education and learning, which closely mirrored traditional monastic establishments, however, the Dominicans were dedicated to the undertakings of pastoral mission. They denoted a lifestyle of owning no property, study and preaching. Their evangelical lifestyle demonstrated to the society that this lifestyle and acquisition to salvation in life was possible within the restraint of the Church. This idea, although similar to the Franciscan Order, is thought to have been an independent application of the idea of apostolic life. The Dominicans were involved in fortifying the Church as an Order to regain heretics and overwhelm heresy. Together with the Franciscan Order, the Dominicans served to increase the Christian spirit, particularly through personal example, as well as teaching and preaching. This new theology of secular life, greatly appealed to a majority in the late medieval society. Saint Dominic sought papal authorization in 1215, and was granted this approval in 1216 from Pope Honorius; however the Order was an official branch of the Augustinian canons. The Dominicans were capable of determining their own leaders, through the abolition of an established hierarchy. Did Saint Dominican purposely target a part of society that required organization, which ultimately led to his and the Dominican's Order's success?

B. Le Goff on the impact of urbanization on Francis' religious life:
Jacques Le Goff suggests that Francis of Assisi (1181/1182-1226) was a part of a new society which comprised of the development of feudalism to monarchianism and the imposition of courtly values on the ruling culture resulting from the influence of dominant lay classes, the knights and aristocracy. Le Goff contends that Francis personally experienced the influence of the new culture of chivalry, through his devotion to poverty and courteous ramifications. In the new society, based largely on economic development, Francis clearly had the aspiration to take on poverty and reject both social and economic values present within the aristocratic society. From his experience of life in Assisi, Francis was determined to enlighten the town to accept poverty, rather than focus on wealth and money. Francis worked in the towns for his daily sustenance, and also proceeded to hermit's retreat, moving between an apostolate to the entire of humanity and regeneration through and in confinement. Ultimately, Francis demonstrated a unique path and pilgrimage to the new society based on urbanization and money. Did the rate of urbanization fundamentally aid Francis in establishing his Franciscan Order?
-- Laura

Saint Clare and the Life of Francisican Women
Clare de Offreduccio de Favarone was Saint Francis’ first female convert (later known as Saint Clare). She was a problem for the brothers at first, as a woman could hardly trample around the countryside living day by day in strict poverty with a group of men; it was indecent by social standards. Thus she, with the aid of Saint Francis, founded the convent San Damiano in Assisi. And for those of you who are curious as to what the place looked like, I have added a link to a short video displaying the architecture of the place.

Both Francisican men and women were expected to live in strict poverty, and even though Clare and her sisters had a roof over their heads they still maintained a life of poverty and mutual support. When Saint Francis died it became difficult for the sisters to maintain this lifestyle as the popes (Gregory IX and later Innocent IV) insisted that they adapt to more monastic norms.
-- Melanie



The foundation of the Dominican order
The Dominican order was founded by Spanish priest entitled Dominic de Guzman (1170-1221). This new order placed heavy emphasis on education and learning. Slocum suggests that the purpose of this order was an attempt to control and organise Cathar heresy. Dominic contained a strong bond with Diego of Osma who was his Bishop. Through this friendship enabled them to join forces with the Cistercians to combat heresy with the approach by encouraging practitioners to emulate apostolic life.  Slocum disagrees with other scholars who suggest that Dominic borrowed his ideas concerning absolute poverty from the Franciscans. Slocum points out that Dominic and Diego undertook the apostolic life before they would have received knowledge of Francis and followers. 

Dominic continued his works during the years of the Albigensian Crusade. At this time he established in Toulouse which became the centre of his preaching duties.
1215 – Dominic travelled to Rome to ask the Pope for authorization for his new order.
1216 – Permission was granted by Pope Honorius III, which recognized the existence of Dominic’s order, as well as confirming his headquarters in Toulouse
1217 – Instructions were given by Dominic to his associates to leave their headquarters in Toulouse and travel throughout Europe. Places preachers were sent to include Paris, Spain and Bologna. A major priority of these missions, thought by Slocum was to infiltrate the finest intellectual enters present in Europe at the time. These were primarily universities, which helped the order to obtain top recruits
1228 – An assembly was held, the first of its kind, which was to discuss and make decisions on internal affairs. This was to become an annual meeting entitled a “General Chapter”. A major accomplishment of this assembly was to usher in a new constitution, based on the monastic tradition. A unique aspect of Dominic’s rule was this constitution, which ensured that every official in every level of the hierarchy system was elected, and were made responsible under their subordinates for the actions of their offices.  Under this system contained different units. A Priory of convent was a basic unit with a prior at its head. The prior was elected by other members of the establishment.  The provincial chapter is another unit, which was large in size and was assigned to discuss the actions of business. Its members were derived from the different province’s in which the order was present. The major unit was called the General chapter, which met annually. The General chapter comprised of an elected master general and one representative elected by the chapter of each province.
--Louise

Monday, 23 April 2012

Clarification

Clarification I:
There are no classes on campus for ATS1316 in week 8. Your posts on the Crusades and Crusade Historians post, below, constitute your 'virtual tutorial' for this week.

Clarification II:
Blogs by presenters in week 9 will go live on Wednesday. Everyone needs to read and comment on these, even if they are not presenting.

Clarification III:
For presenters in weeks 9-11:

Topic St Francis (wk 9) Crusades (wk 10) Black Death (wk 11)
Blog Post
to Kathleen
5pm Tue. 24th April 5pm Tue. 1st May 5pm Tue. 8th May
Presentation Mon. 30th April Mon. 7th May Mon. 14th May
Essay Due Fri. 11 May Fri. 18 May Fri. 25 May

Friday, 20 April 2012

Important Announcement

Unfortunately the audio of the week 7 lectures have not been recorded. The slides are available, however, on both MULO and Blackboard. I am very sorry for the inconvenience, but sometimes technology does fail. I know that some of you have clashes and need to rely on the recordings. I would urge, however, those of you who can attend the lectures to do so, because that is the only absolutely guaranteed way that you have of hearing the material
Cheers, Clare

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Crusades and Crusade Historians

 [Edit: spelling of Tyerman corrected - thanks Jonathan!]
Truce between Christians and Saracens.
Matthew Paris, Chronica Maiora, Parker MS 16II, f.139v.
In lectures during week 7 Clare raised the issue of thinking about where historians are coming from when they write. I'd like us to try and incorporate this into our discussions in this week's virtual tutorial. I've provided some links that give you other people's perspectives on Christopher Tyerman, author of the chapter on the Meaning of the Crusades, and his work. There are reviews of one of his recent books by Jonathan Philips - another well-known historian of the Crusades - and Dame Janet (a.k.a. 'Jinty') Nelson, a prominent early medievalist. I've also given you a link to an interview with Dr Tyreman himself. If you can, I recommend reading through these after you've looked at Tyerman's chapter. Address the questions in the reading pack, but also consider whether Tyerman's view seems to represent a consensus; and how his views differ from or relate to those of others who have written and thought about the Crusades.

In this interview, Tyerman talks about how it is misleading and ahistorical to draw direct connections between modern wars in the Middle East and the medieval crusading movement. I agree with him on this point, and it brings me to a general matter I forgot to mention in class, which is: while modern parallels and experiences can be useful tools for helping us think about the past, we should never confuse them with historical argument itself, which always has to be based in the evidence and context of the period. I'm sure you knew this - but especially following our discussions about ANZAC cove and Canterbury it seemed a good time to remind ourselves of this point...


Urban II preaching the crusade

But back to the Crusades! The Institute for Historical Research in London runs a monthly seminar about the Crusades, so clearly there's no shortage of opinion and debate on the topic.

The same was true at the time of the very first crusade. As Megan told us a couple of weeks back, pope Urban's sermon was recorded in different versions by a range of observers. Does applying similar principles of interpretation to these reports help you think about how and why they differ? Where were these medieval writers coming from, do you think? Why were they writing? Who was in their assumed audience?
Post your thoughts and responses to these readings below by Monday evening. Then we'll be moving on to St Francis and Co.!

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Women's Roles

What are the views of women that are implied in the bible and how did this influence their role in Medieval society?

During the Medieval Period the Bible was the ultimate 'how to live a good life' guide.  But it is important to remember that the majority of society could not read or write.  The bible stories were preached through Masses and these Masses were dominated by men (priests, bishops etc).  It was mostly men that interpreted the bible, men who extracted the message and then men who passed this message on to the general population.  Should this influence our own interpretation of medieval religious primary sources? 

Biblical characters were crucial role models for women in medieval society.  There appears to be four types of women during this period; Virgins, Mothers, Nuns and Sinners.  They can be clearly seen through stories of women in the bible. 

Eve came under much criticism during this time, for it was she who convinced Adam to eat the fruit on the forbidden tree. She created original sin and was the first sinner. Death came through Eve. It is interesting to note that she is blamed for Adam's actions... 

Painting of Joan of Arc from c1450-1500
Held in the Centre Historique des Archives Nationales, Paris.
Virgins in Medieval Society were under the protection of their fathers and brothers,
and considered the safeguards of purity. Medieval Society adored Mother Mary, for she epitomised all purity and sinlessness. Both a virgin and a mother, she gave hope and restored beauty to the world. Devoted to God and her son Jesus, she was the ultimate role  model for medieval women as homemakers. Life was restored through Mary.

Mary Magdalene brought hope to women in the medieval times. She was a prostitute and would have been regarded as an outcast. She was a sinner who sought forgiveness from Jesus. He forgave her and she followed Him and spread the word of God.

Saint Scholastica devoted her life to God as a Nun. The sister of Saint Benedict of Nursia, she had a special relationship with God and he listened to her prayers. She lived a good life according to God's teachings.

Are these the only types of women in Medieval Society? How does the Image of Joan of Arc challenge this idea?  
--Michelle

Marriage, Status and Alliance
Marriage is one of the ways in which historians are able to gain knowledge on the role of women and what rights they have in late medieval Europe. In this weeks readings we see how marriages in the late medieval Europe were formed to create alliances, bring a truce and create peace. Because of this the women’s roles went beyond just being a good wife but to uphold the alliance between the two families. The exchange of marriage during the 13th and 15th century was very important in society as it ended “prolonged vendettas” and “ancient hatreds” as well as process of rivalry at times of open warfare.  However, women in these types of marriages moved in two directions: either upward and became higher on the social scale than her own or down ward. Usually as the reading explains they would go downwards as fathers would chose women who had a higher status, this would cause problems for the women as they felt socially degraded because they were married to some one of inferior blood and rank.

Do you think that these marriages still exits today?
King Henry I of France sending a bishop, and his marriage to Anne of Kiev. An example of the type of marriage explained above, as king Henry married Anne of Kiev who was from a far off principality.
 --Anna

Women as Wives
Although some chose to follow a religious life, and others refrained for personal or economic reasons, most women in the Middle Ages married. Although it became a Christian sacrament, marriage was viewed as being an inferior state to virginity; St Paul wrote that ‘It is better to marry than to burn with passion’ (1 Corinthians 7:9). The below image is a miniature from a 12th century German manuscript called Der Jungfrauspiegel. It shows the benefits for three types of women: virgins, married women, and widows. Do you think you could tell which group belongs to which line of the image?
llustration: Women Harvesting, Der Jungfrauenspiegel, Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Bonn, 1310. Wikimedia Commons
A literary text from this time, Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, will be used in the presentation on Monday, and you will find it useful to read the text itself (two tales in translation, links provided below). For those unfamiliar with the work, a group of pilgrims is travelling to Canterbury Cathedral to visit the shrine of St Thomas Beckett. Between the travellers arises a story-telling contest with the winner awarded a meal. Two of the tales that reflect views of wives are the Clerk’s tale, which tells the story of Griselda, a virtuous wife who faces cruel tests by her husband (http://www.umm.maine.edu/faculty/necastro/chaucer/translation/ct/10clt.html).  The other story is the Wife of Bath. Her prologue is almost twice as long as her story, both of which can be found here: http://www.umm.maine.edu/faculty/necastro/chaucer/translation/ct/07wbt.html. Her tale is about a knight who rapes a woman, and is given 366 days to find the answer to the question of what women really want, or else be condemned to death. To prepare for Monday’s tutorial, give some thought as to how you think the answer to the knight’s question compares with the second set reading (pages 305 to 308), especially when women were expected to submit to their husbands. There should be a chance for a group discussion on this, so please come prepared to contribute.
--Catherine